Asymmetric international mobility of highly talented scientists is well documented. We contribute to the explanation of this
phenomenon, looking at the "competitiveness" of research universities in terms of being able to attract talented early stage
researchers. We propose a new hybrid quantitative-qualitative methodology for comparing the top tier of national higher education
systems: We characterise a country's capability to offer attractive entry positions into academic careers building upon the
results of a large scale experiment on the determinants of job choice in academia, using a mix of data and expert-based assessment.
We examine salary level, quality of life, career perspectives, research organisation, balance between teaching and research,
funding and the probability of working with high quality peers. Our results in the form of a job attractiveness index indicate
that overall, the US research universities offer the most attractive jobs for early stage researchers, consistent with the
asymmetric flow of talented scientists to the USA. By comparison with rankings that use survey results or bibliometric data,
our methodology offers the advantage of comparing structures and factors shaping the process of research rather than results
of research. The findings are hence directly relevant for policies aiming at improving the attractiveness of research universities.
Keywords:attractiveness of jobs in academia, brain drain TP_Wettbewerbsfaehigkeit_Qualifikation
Forschungsbereich:Industrieökonomie, Innovation und internationaler Wettbewerb