We revisit the US weekly economic index (WEI) put forth by Lewis, Mertens, Stock and Trivedi (2021). In a narrow sense, we
replicate their main results with data gathered from its original sources. In a wide sense, we apply the methodology established
in Wegmüller, Glocker and Guggia (2023) to adjust the weekly input series for seasonal patterns, calendar day effects, and
excess volatility. In a long sense, we show that our proposed data adjustment significantly improves the nowcasting performance
of the WEI.
We construct a composite index to measure the real activity of the Swiss economy on a weekly frequency. The index is based
on a novel high-frequency data set capturing economic activity across distinct dimensions over a long-time horizon. We propose
a six-step procedure for extracting precise business cycle signals from the raw data. By means of a real-time evaluation,
we highlight the importance of our proposed adjustment procedure: (i) our weekly index significantly outperforms a comparable
index without adjusted input variables; and (ii) the weekly index outperforms established monthly indicators in nowcasting
GDP growth. These insights should help improve other recently developed high-frequency indicators.
Timo Wollmershäuser, Stefan Ederer, Friederike Fourné, Christian Glocker, Max Lay, Robert Lehmann, Sebastian Link, Ann-Christin Rathje, Sascha Möhrle, Joachim Ragnitz, Radek Šauer, Stefan Sauer, Moritz Schasching, Lara Zarges
Auftraggeber: ifo Institut – Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München e.V.
Die deutsche Wirtschaft leidet unter gewaltigen Angebotsschocks. Engpässe bei Energie, Vorprodukten und Arbeitskräften belasten
die Produktion und treiben die Inflation auf Rekordhöhen. Der Staat versucht die Folgen mit breit angelegten Entlastungsprogrammen
abzufedern. Er schafft damit aber auch Nachfrage, die bei beschränkten Produktionskapazitäten den Preisauftrieb hoch hält.
Zwar dürfte als Folge der staatlichen Strom- und Gaspreisbremsen die Inflationsrate von 7,8% in diesem Jahr auf 6,4% im kommenden
Jahr sinken. Gleichzeitig wird allerdings die Kernrate voraussichtlich von 4,8% auf 5,8% steigen. Erst im Jahr 2024 dürfte
der Preisdruck langsam nachgeben und die Inflationsrate auf 2,8% bzw. die Kernrate auf 2,6% zurückgehen. Das Bruttoinlandsprodukt
wird im Winterhalbjahr 2022/23 schrumpfen und die deutsche Wirtschaft damit in eine Rezession geraten. Ab dem Frühjahr 2023
dürfte sich die Konjunktur dann erholen und die Wirtschaft in der zweiten Jahreshälfte mit kräftigeren Raten zulegen, wenn
die Einkommen wieder stärker steigen als die Preise. Alles in allem wird das Bruttoinlandsprodukt in diesem Jahr um 1,8% zunehmen
und im kommenden Jahr geringfügig um 0,1% schrumpfen. Im Jahr 2024 liegt der Zuwachs dann wieder bei 1,6%.
We assess the effectiveness of the financial sector stabilisation measures taken by the Austrian authorities in the wake of
the global financial crisis. Employing an event study methodology, we evaluate domestic and cross-border effects involving
Central, Eastern and South-eastern European economies. We identify recapitalisations and public guarantees as the most effective
sovereign interventions. Both mitigate financial market stress at home and abroad. However, a risk-shifting effect emerges
at the sovereign's expense which undermines their effectiveness relative to monetary policy interventions. Moreover, in complement
to the actual implementation, the mere announcement of interventions already mitigates financial market stress, underscoring
the extent of policy credibility.
We study empirically how various labour market institutions – (i) union density, (ii) unemployment benefit remuneration, and
(iii) employment protection – shape fiscal multipliers and output volatility. Our theoretical model highlights that more stringent
labour market institutions attenuate both fiscal spending multipliers and macroeconomic volatility. This is validated empirically
by an interacted panel vector autoregressive model estimated for 16 OECD countries. The strongest effects emanate from employment
protection, followed by union density. While some labor market institutions mitigate the contemporaneous impact of shocks,
they, however, reinforce their propagation mechanism. The main policy implication is that stringent labor market institutions
render cyclical fiscal policies less relevant for macroeconomic stabilization.
We propose a modelling approach based on a set of small-scale factor models linked together in a cluster with linkages derived
from Granger causality tests. GDP forecasts are produced using a disaggregated approach across production, expenditure and
income accounts. The method combines the advantages of large structural macroeconomic models and small factor models, making
our cluster of dynamic factor models (CDFM) useful for large-scale model-consistent forecasting. The CDFM has a simple structure,
and its forecasts outperform those of a variety of competing models and professional forecasters. In addition, the CDFM allows
forecasters to use their own judgment to produce conditional forecasts.
Studie von: Österreichisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung – Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliches Rechenzentrum
We present an uncertainty measure that is based on a business survey in which uncertainty is captured directly by a qualitative
question on subjective uncertainty regarding expectations. Uncertainty perceptions display persistence at the firm level and
changes are associated with past business assessments and expectations. While our uncertainty measure correlates with commonly
used alternatives, it is superior in forecasting and suggests a larger role of uncertainty shocks for aggregate fluctuations.
Its informational content is highest when considering smaller firms or firms with a low growth rate. Our results confirm the
feasibility of constructing uncertainty measures from business survey questions that elicit information on uncertainty of
respondents directly.
This study assesses the effects of reserve requirements on the probability of bank failure and compares them to those of capital
requirements. While both requirements affect banks' balance sheets and lending rates similarly, their effects on financial
stability can differ markedly. When adjustment in deposit rates is constrained, the cost effect arising from higher reserve
requirements may incentivise banks to choose riskier assets rendering worse financial conditions. Borrowers' moral hazard
problem augments these adverse effects. They are mitigated when considering imperfectly correlated loan-default as higher
interest revenues from non-defaulting loans curb losses from defaulting loans.